Различия

Здесь показаны различия между двумя версиями данной страницы.

@@ Строка 1: / Строка 1: @@
+===== Цитаты о системном мышлении =====
+Systems thinking has its foundation in the field of system dynamics, founded in 1956 by MIT professor Jay Forrester. Professor Forrester recognized the need for a better way of testing new ideas about social systems, in the same way we can test ideas in engineering. Systems thinking allows people to make their understanding of social systems explicit and improve them in the same way that people can use engineering principles to make explicit and improve their understanding of mechanical systems.
+**The Systems Thinking Approach**
+The approach of systems thinking is fundamentally different from that of traditional forms of analysis. Traditional analysis focuses on the separating the individual pieces of what is being studied; in fact, the word "analysis" actually comes from the root meaning "to break into constituent parts." Systems thinking, in contrast, focuses on how the thing being studied interacts with the other constituents of the system—a set of elements that interact to produce behavior—of which it is a part. This means that instead of isolating smaller and smaller parts of the system being studied, systems thinking works by expanding its view to take into account larger and larger numbers of interactions as an issue is being studied. This results in sometimes strikingly different conclusions than those generated by traditional forms of analysis, especially when what is being studied is dynamically complex or has a great deal of feedback from other sources, internal or external.
+[[ http://www.thinking.net/Systems_Thinking/Intro_to_ST/intro_to_st.html | Introduction to Systems Thinking. Daniel Aronson]]
+----
+Systems thinking is an approach to integration that is based on the belief that the component parts of a system will act differently when isolated from the system's environment or other parts of the system. Standing in contrast to Descartes' and others' reductionism and philosophical analysis, it proposes to view systems in a holistic manner. Consistent with systems philosophy, systems thinking concerns an understanding of a system by examining the linkages and interactions between the elements that comprise the entirety of the system.
+Systems thinking attempts to illustrate that events are separated by distance and time and that small catalytic events can cause large changes in complex systems. Acknowledging that an improvement in one area of a system can adversely affect another area of the system, it promotes organizational communication at all levels in order to avoid the silo effect. Systems thinking techniques may be used to study any kind of system — natural, scientific, engineered, human, or conceptual.
+[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_thinking|Wikipedia]]
+----
+One of the major breakthroughs in understanding the complex world of organizations is the field of
+systems theory. The field studies systems from the perspective of the whole system, its various
+subsystems and the recurring patterns in the relationships between the subsystems. Systems theory
+has greatly influenced how we understand and change organizations.
+The application of this theory is called systems analysis. One of the major tools of systems analysis
+is systems thinking. Basically, systems thinking is a way of helping a person to view systems from a
+broad perspective that includes seeing overall structures, patterns and cycles in systems, rather than
+seeing only specific events in the system. This broad view can help you to quickly identify the real
+causes of issues in organizations and know just where to work to address them. Systems thinking
+has produced a variety of principles and tools for analyzing and changing systems.
+[[http://www.managementhelp.org/misc/defn-systemsthinking.pdf|What is Systems Thinking?]]

личные инструменты

Различия

навигация

поиск

инструменты